Comments for Pride of America

Comment on Congressional Spouse? by freduard88

freduard88 — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:59:56 +0000

Wow! I totally agree with you! That’s just ridiculous! I guess some people just want to make their own definitions! Too bad that it will probably catch on and people will start and continue to misuse certain words. =(

I like your blog, by the way. Check out mine sometime when you have a chance and give me some constructive criticism! =)
Say hi to Isely for me (if you see her anytime soon)!

Comment on Not a Choice, but a Child by Lauren

Lauren — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:20:36 +0000

Karen –

Those pictures were taken of live fetus’s through ultrasound imaging cameras. Only a few of them are of dead fetus’s, but those deaths were caused by ectopic pregnancies (or tubal pregnancies), not abortion.

Comment on Not a Choice, but a Child by Karen

Karen — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:52:33 +0000

Except without abortion you would have never seen that series of photographs. Ironic, isn’t it?

Comment on Madame Secretary, Uncut and Unrated by Rebekah

Rebekah — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:40:17 +0000

ha! What an attitude. I dont care how insulted she was, she had no right to let it show when she represents America, some Secretary of state!

Comment on 11 Most Expensive Tragedies in History by Economy » 11 Most Costly Disasters in History

Economy » 11 Most Costly Disasters in History — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:00:43 +0000

[...] just found an earlier version of this post on Pride of America dated [...]

Comment on 11 Most Expensive Tragedies in History by 11 Most Costly Disasters in History « America, You Asked For It!

11 Most Costly Disasters in History « America, You Asked For It! — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:55:07 +0000

[...] just found an earlier version of this post on Pride of America dated [...]

Comment on Unity in the GOP? by Lauren

Lauren — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 05:08:02 +0000

Civ1,

The point of the article is not whether or not what Audra did was right or wrong. The point is how it was handled. Is there a way to take care of such a matter without telling the world? Yes. Was it handled that way? No. And that is what hurt us.

Believe me, I am all for standing up for your beliefs. But there is a fine line between taking a stand and slandering someone.

Comment on Unity in the GOP? by Young Republicans Choose Hate… « RINO Elephant

Young Republicans Choose Hate… « RINO Elephant — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:33:20 +0000

[...] them towards losing the politics of hate, is to become involved ourselves. While some want us to forget about racism and bigotry, and get along for the sake of getting along. This is not one of those times, we can not get along [...]

Comment on Unity in the GOP? by Civ1

Civ1 — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:04:55 +0000

Wow. So in your opinion being loyal to “the Party” is more important than trying to stop racists and bigots from becoming Party leadership? That is seriously screwed up, but I’m sure you would have fit right in with the Nazis.

Ever heard of speaking up for what’s right, despite “loyalties”??? There are no words for people like you. Except… you’re a total *[censored by author]*.

Comment on Unity in the GOP? by tomllewis

tomllewis — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:23:51 +0000

Unfortunately I’ve seen it happen many times what people will do to achieve personal power. Very sad and very human. The Dems do it to, but the MSM only points it our when Republicans fall into that pettiness. Now the MSM and the nutroots will have a field day again attacking us all as racists.